לאחר הפסח — ב״בל יחל״. ״שאת נהנית לי עד החג אם הולכת את לבית אביך עד הפסח״, הלכה לפני הפסח — אסורה בהנאתו עד החג, ומותרת לילך אחר הפסח.
If she derived benefit from him before Passover and went to visit her father after Passover, she is liable for violating the prohibition of: He should not profane his word (Numbers 30:3), as the condition was fulfilled and she violated the vow retroactively. If the husband vowed: Benefit from me is konam for you until the Festival if you go to your father’s house from now until Passover, then if she went to his house before Passover, it is prohibited for her to derive benefit from him until the Festival, and it is permitted for her to go to her father’s house after Passover, as that time period is not included in his stipulation.
גמ׳ האומר לאשתו ״קונם מעשה ידיך עלי״, ״קונם הן על פי״, ״קונם הן לפי וכו׳״, ישמעאל איש כפר ימא, ואמרי לה איש כפר דימא, העלה בידו בצל שעקרו בשביעית, ונטעו בשמינית, ורבו גידוליו על עיקרו. והכי קא מיבעיא ליה: גידוליו היתר ועיקרו אסור, כיון דרבו גידוליו מעיקרו — אותן גידולי היתר מעלין את האיסור, או לא? אתא לקמיה דרבי אמי לא הוה בידיה.
Talmud: We learned in the Mishnah: For one who says to his wife: Your handicraft is konam upon me, or it is konam upon my mouth, or it is konam to my mouth, it is prohibited to benefit from her handicraft. Yishmael, a man of Kefar Yamma, and some say, a man of Kefar Dima, raised a dilemma with regard to an onion that one uprooted during the Sabbatical Year, which was therefore sanctified with the sanctity of the Sabbatical Year, and he then planted it during the 8th year, and its growths that developed in the 8th year exceeded its principal original Sabbatical-Year onion. And this is the dilemma that he raised: Its 8th-year growth is permitted, and its Sabbatical-Year principal is prohibited. Since its growth exceeded its principal, do those permitted growths neutralize the prohibition of the onion, or do they not? Yishmael came and raised the dilemma before R' Ami, and he did not have an answer readily available.