Study Nedarim folio 28B with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
then they are not subject to the possibility of redemption.
Talmud: The Talmud questions the language of the Mishnah: Why does the Mishnah utilize the wording: They have redemption and they do not have redemption? Let the Mishnah teach: They are consecrated and they are not consecrated, since the primary novelty is that they are consecrated, but not comple
The Talmud elaborates: How did he take a vow? What was the precise language that he used? Ameimar said: Where he says: These saplings are like an offering if they are not cut down today, and the day passed and they were not cut down. The Talmud asks: If so, why do I need to say that they are conse
The Talmud asks: But isn’t this taught together with the case of a garment, indicating that the two are equivalent, and is a garment ready for burning, i.e., is it assumed that it will burn? The Talmud answers: Yes, in a case where there is a fire. The Talmud explains: Here also there is a great
§ The Mishnah states that if he said: These saplings are like an offering until they are cut down, they are not subject to the possibility of redemption. The Talmud asks: And are they not subject to redemption forever? Bar Padda said: If he redeemed them, they become consecrated again, as they hav