Zevachim 34B

ופסול. תיובתא דריש לקיש! תיובתא.

and the offering is therefore disqualified. The Talmud concludes: The refutation of the opinion of Reish Lakish is indeed a conclusive refutation.

וכולן שקיבלו כו׳. בעא מיניה ריש לקיש מרבי יוחנן: פסול ⁠– מהו שיעשה שירים?

§ The Mishnah teaches: And with regard to all of them, in a case where they collected the blood with the intent to offer it beyond its designated time or outside its designated area, if there is blood of the soul that remains in the animal, the priest fit for Temple service should again collect the blood and sprinkle it on the altar. Reish Lakish asked R' Yoḥanan: If an individual unfit for Temple service presented the blood, what is the halakha with regard to the blood that remains in the animal? Does the fact that he presented some blood render the rest of it a remainder and no longer fit to be presented, or perhaps the presenting performed by an unfit individual is not considered valid, and therefore a priest fit for Temple service may present the blood again?

אמר ליה: אין עושה שירים אלא חוץ לזמנו וחוץ למקומו, הואיל ומרצה לפיגולו.

R' Yoḥanan said to him: An invalid presenting does not render the rest of the blood a remainder unless it is a case where a priest fit for Temple service presented the blood with the intent to offer it beyond its designated time or outside its designated area, since it is only in that case that the presenting of the blood effects acceptance, i.e., it is considered a valid presenting, with regard to rendering the offering piggul, i.e., an offering that was sacrificed with the intent to consume it after its designated time.