Study Temurah folio 22A with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
Furthermore, one may not derive benefit from any of these sin offerings ab initio, but if one derived benefit from them, after the fact, he is not liable to bring a sin offering for misuse of consecrated items. And if the lost animal was found and discovered to be unfit before the owner achieved ato
Talmud: Although there are 5 types of sin offerings that are sequestered and left to die, the Mishnah initially states: The offspring of a sin offering, and the substitute for a sin offering, and a sin offering whose owner has died shall be sequestered and left to die, and only then mentions the re
The Talmud asks: This Mishnah also appears in tractate Me’ila (10b). Why do I need the tanna to teach this Mishnah in tractate Me’ila and why do I need him to teach it in tractate Temura? The Talmud responds: Here, in Temura, the Mishnah taught the halakhot pertaining to substitution, which is th
§ Reish Lakish says: With regard to a sin offering whose first year from birth has passed, one considers it as though it is standing in a cemetery, where a priest cannot enter in order to retrieve it and sacrifice it, and it is left to graze until it develops a blemish, after which it is sold and
The Talmud objects: We learned in the Mishnah: With regard to a sin offering whose first year from birth has passed and a sin offering that was lost and when it was found it was blemished, if it was after the owner achieved atonement through the sacrifice of another animal as a sin offering, the ble