ומה נר דלהכי עבידא, כי לא אדליק בה שרי לטלטולה — מטה דלאו להכי עבידא לא כל שכן?! אלא אי איתמר, הכי איתמר: אמר רב יהודה אמר רב: מטה שיחדה למעות, הניח עליה מעות — אסור לטלטלה, לא הניח עליה מעות — מותר לטלטלה. לא יחדה למעות, יש עליה מעות — אסור לטלטלה, אין עליה מעות — מותר לטלטלה. והוא שלא היו עליה בין השמשות.
He explains his objection: And just as a lamp, which is made for this purpose, for lighting, when he did not light it, he is permitted to move it, a bed, which is not made for that purpose, for placing money on it, all the more so moving it would be permitted. Rather, if it was stated, it was stated as follows: Rav Yehuda said that Rav said: A bed that one designated for money to be placed upon it, if one left money upon it one day, it becomes designated for that purpose and it is prohibited to move it on Shabbat. If one did not leave money upon it, it is permitted to move it on Shabbat. A bed, which one did not designate for money to be placed upon it, if there is money upon it on Shabbat itself, it is prohibited to move it on Shabbat. If there is not money on it, it is permitted to move it. And that is only when there was not money on it during the twilight period between Friday and Shabbat. If there was money on it at that time, the bed itself becomes set aside due to prohibition for the entire Shabbat, even if the money fell off the bed in the course of the day.
אמר עולא, מתיב רבי אליעזר: מוכני שלה בזמן שהיא נשמטת, אין חבור לה ואין נמדדת עמה ואין מצלת עמה באהל המת ואין גוררין אותה בשבת — בזמן שיש עליה מעות.
Ulla said: R' Eliezer raised an objection to Rav’s statement from that which we learned in a Mishnah. This Mishnah deals primarily with the laws of ritual impurity and discusses the relationship between a wagon and its undercarriage [mukheni], the system of wheels and the frame at the base of the wagon. And the rabbis said: The wagon’s undercarriage, when it is detachable from the wagon, it is not considered connected to it and they are considered independent units as far as the halakhot of ritual impurity are concerned. And it is not measured with it. This refers to calculating the volume of 40 se’a, as a vessel with a volume larger than 40 se’a does not have the legal status of a vessel and cannot become ritually impure. And the undercarriage likewise does not protect together with the wagon in a tent over the corpse. A large wagon is considered a tent in and of itself and the vessels inside the wagon do not become impure if the wagon is over a corpse. However, the undercarriage is not included with the wagon in this regard. If a hole in the wagon is sealed by the undercarriage, it is not considered sealed with regard to preventing ritual impurity. And, likewise, one may not pull the wagon on Shabbat when there is money upon it.