Shabbat 142A

מאי איריא אבן, אפילו דינר נמי! אלמה אמר רבא: לא שנו אלא אבן, אבל דינר ⁠— אסור! אבן, אי נפלה (לה) ⁠— לא אתי אבוה לאיתויי. דינר, אי נפיל ⁠— אתי אבוה לאתויי.

why does the Mishnah refer specifically to moving a stone? The same should hold true even for a dinar, as well. Why, then, did Rava say: They only taught this in a case where the child has a stone in his hand; however, if the child has a dinar in his hand, it is prohibited to lift the child? The Talmud answers: Actually, lifting the child with a dinar should also be permitted. However, the rabbis issued a decree prohibiting lifting the child with a dinar because with regard to a stone, if it falls, his father will not come to bring it. However, with regard to a dinar, if it falls, his father will come to bring it.

תניא כוותיה דרבא: המוציא כליו מקופלים ומונחים על כתפו, וסנדליו וטבעותיו בידו ⁠— חייב. ואם היה מלובש בהן ⁠— פטור.

It was taught in a baraita in accordance with the opinion of Rava: On Shabbat, one who carries out his clothes to the public domain while they are folded and placed on his shoulder, and his sandals on his feet and his rings in his hand, not on his fingers, is liable. And if he was wearing them, he is exempt for all of them, as they are negated relative to him.

המוציא אדם וכליו עליו, וסנדליו ברגליו, וטבעותיו בידיו ⁠— פטור, ואילו הוציאן כמות שהן ⁠— חייב.

One who carries out a person with his garments on him, and his sandals on his feet, and his rings on the fingers of his hands, i.e., wearing all of his clothes and jewelry in the typical manner, is exempt, whereas if he carried them out as they are, i.e., the person was holding his clothes in his hands, he is liable for carrying out the clothes, just as Rava said.