תנהו ענין למלקות.
apply it to the matter of lashes, as forewarning is required for the court to be able to administer lashes.
Study Sanhedrin folio 41A with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
תנהו ענין למלקות.
apply it to the matter of lashes, as forewarning is required for the court to be able to administer lashes.
דבי חזקיה תנא: ״וכי יזד איש על רעהו להרגו בערמה״ – שהתרו בו, ועדיין הוא מזיד.
The school of Ḥizkiyya taught a source for the requirement of forewarning from the verse concerning the court-imposed capital punishment meted out to a murderer, as it is states: “But if a man come intentionally upon his neighbor to slay him with guile” (Exodus 21:14). How do the witnesses know that he acted intentionally? It must be that they forewarned him, and still he acts intentionally.
דבי רבי ישמעאל תנא: ״המצאים אתו מקשש עצים״ – שהתרו בו, ועדיין הוא מקושש.
The school of R' Yishmael taught a source for the requirement to forewarn transgressors from the verse concerning the court-imposed capital punishment meted out to the wood-gatherer on Shabbat in the wilderness, as it is stated: “And they that found him gathering sticks brought him” (Numbers 15:33). By writing “gathering” in the present tense, the verse indicates that they forewarned him, but he is still gathering.
דבי רבי תנא: ״על דבר אשר ענה״ – על עסקי דיבור.
The school of R' Yehuda HaNasi taught a source for the requirement to forewarn a transgressor from the verse concerning the court-imposed capital punishment meted out to one who commits adultery with a betrothed young woman, as it is stated: “For the matter [devar] that he has humbled his neighbor’s wife” (Deuteronomy 22:24). They make a verbal analogy: For matters involving speech [dibbur], the punishment is given only if the witnesses issued a verbal forewarning.
וצריכא, דאי כתב רחמנא ״אחתו״ – הוה אמינא: חייבי מלקות – אין, חייבי מיתות – לא. כתב רחמנא ״כי יזד״.
The Talmud comments: And it is necessary to have all of these sources, since if God would write the requirement of forewarning in the context of “his sister” (Leviticus 20:17) alone, I would say: Those liable to receive lashes, yes, they do require forewarning, but those liable to receive court-imposed capital punishments, whose transgressions are severe, do not require forewarning. Therefore God writes, with regard to a murderer: “If a man come intentionally.”
Text data via Sefaria: William Davidson Edition - English and William Davidson Edition - Vocalized Aramaic, CC-BY-NC; edition provenance: Koren. Display terminology has been modernized for readability.