Eruvin 80A

ואין טועמין מפירותיה.

and whose fruit they do not taste. This tree is evidently consecrated to the cult.

ושמואל אמר: כגון דאמרי ״הני תמרי לשיכרא דבי נצרפי דשתו ליה ביום חגם״. (אמר אמימר:) ואמרו לי סבי דפומבדיתא: הלכתא כוותיה דשמואל.

And Shmuel said: For example: if they say: These dates are for the beer of the temple of Nitzrefei, which they drink on the day of their festival, then this is enough to establish the tree as an asheira. Ameimar said: And the elders of Pumbedita said to me with regard to this issue: The halakha is in accordance with the opinion of Shmuel.

מיתיבי: כיצד משתתפין במבוי ⁠— מביאים חבית של יין ושל שמן ושל תמרים ושל גרוגרות ושל שאר מיני פירות.

The Talmud returns to Rav Yehuda’s ruling that the jug used for merging the alleyway must be raised a handbreadth from the ground. The Talmud raises an objection from a baraita: How does one merge an alleyway? One brings a jug of wine, or oil, or dates, or dried figs, or any other type of produce for merging the alleyway.

אם משלו ⁠— צריך לזכות. ואם משלהן ⁠— צריך להודיע. ומגביה מן הקרקע משהו! מאי ״משהו״ נמי דקאמר? טפח.

If one contributed a jug of his own, he must confer possession to all the other residents by means of another person who acquires it on their behalf. And if the jug is theirs, he must at least inform them that he is merging the alleyway. And the one acquiring it on behalf of the others raises the jug a minimal amount from the ground. Apparently, the jug need not be raised a handbreadth. The Talmud answers: Here too, what is this minimal amount of which the tanna of the baraita spoke? This expression means a handbreadth, but no less.

איתמר: שיתופי מבואות, רב אמר: אין צריך לזכות, ושמואל אמר: צריך לזכות. עירובי תחומין, רב אמר: צריך לזכות, ושמואל אמר: אין צריך לזכות.

It is stated that the amora’im disagreed with regard to the acquisition of a merging of alleyways. Rav said: It is not necessary to confer possession of the food used in merging the alleyway to all the residents of the alleyway; and Shmuel said: It is necessary to confer possession to them. They likewise disagreed with regard to a joining of Shabbat boundaries, but the opinions are reversed. Rav said: It is necessary to confer possession of the food to all those who wish to be included in the eiruv, and Shmuel said: It is not necessary to confer possession to them.