Study Chullin folio 101B with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
The Talmud asks: And does R' Yosei HaGelili not hold that a more inclusive prohibition takes effect where there is an already existing prohibition?
But isn’t it taught in a baraita: When Shabbat and Yom Kippur occur on the same day, if one acted unwittingly and performed prohibited labor, from where is it derived that he is liable for this by itself and for that by itself, i.e., he is liable to bring two sin offerings, for having transgressed
The Talmud answers that on this topic Ravin sent a letter citing a statement in the name of R' Yosei, son of R' Ḥanina: This is the correct presentation of this teaching [hatza’a shel Mishnah], i.e., the opinions in this baraita are accurate, but one must reverse the attributions of each opinion so
The Talmud continues to discuss the opinion of R' Yosei HaGelili. Rav Yitzḥak bar Ya’akov bar Giyorei sent a letter citing a statement in the name of R' Yoḥanan: According to the statement of R' Yosei HaGelili, as stated in the baraita once the attributions have been reversed, if one unwittingly pe
The Talmud asks: What is the reason for R' Yoḥanan’s statement? Abaye said: Shabbat is established and permanent, i.e., it always occurs on the 7th day of the week, whereas in the case of Yom Kippur, it is the court that establishes it, as the rabbis determine Rosh Chodesh. Consequently, Shabbat