קא משמע לן — ״כל שיש בו״. ואי אשמעינן ״כל שיש בו״ הוה אמינא כל שיש בו חמשת המינים — אין, אבל אורז ודוחן — לא, משום דעל ידי תערובת. אבל איתיה בעיניה — נימא אפילו אורז ודוחן נמי מברכין עליו ״בורא מיני מזונות״. קא משמע לן — כל שהוא מחמשת המינים הוא דמברכין עליו בורא מיני מזונות, לאפוקי אורז ודוחן, דאפילו איתיה בעיניה לא מברכינן ״בורא מיני מזונות״.
Therefore, he teaches us: Anything that has of the 5 species of grain in it, even if it is in the context of a mixture with other ingredients. And had he taught us only: Anything that has of the 5 species of grain in it, I would have said that specifically over anything that has of the 5 species of grain in it, yes, one recites: Who creates the various kinds of nourishment, even if it is in the context of a mixture with other ingredients. However, over anything that has rice and millet in it, no, one does not recite: Who creates the various kinds of nourishment, because one is eating it in the context of a mixture. However, if the rice or millet is in its pure, unadulterated form, say that even over rice and millet one recites: Who creates the various kinds of nourishment, because they, too, are types of grain. Therefore, he teaches us specifically: Anything that is from the 5 species of grain, one recites over it: Who creates the various kinds of nourishment, to the exclusion of rice and millet, over which, even in its pure, unadulterated form, one does not recite: Who creates the various kinds of nourishment.